DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR ;
Docket No: NR8172-14
11 september 2014
Dear Staff Sergeant Ep
This ig in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to: the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
~
You requested removing the fitness report for 6 May to 14 July
2011. —
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has
directed modifying the contested report by removing the mark
from section A, item 6.¢ {*Disciplinary Action’) and entering a
mark in item 6.b (“Derogatory Material”).
aA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your |
application on il September 2014.. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together, with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
-regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation
Review Board (PERB), dated 3 July 2014, a Copy of which is
attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. in this comnection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
Accordingly, your application for relief beyond or other than
that effected by CMC has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8174 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2014. Decumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9944 14
"; removing, from the justification for the mark in section G.3, “MRO received a 6105"; removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), Sect[ion] A, Item 6b: MRO received a 6105 for an alcohol related incident that occurred on 8 Nov 2013.” and removing, from section k.4 (reviewing officer's comments), *,imdicated in the 6105 counseling,”. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8716 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7247 14
and by removing “Directed Comment, Sectfion] A, Item Tb: recommend that the MRO [Marine reported on] not be considered for promotion with his contemporaries.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5198 14
You requested removing the fitness reports for 1 January to 25 June 2007, 11 July to 31 December 2009 and 19 May to 31 December 2010. It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report for 1 January to 25 June 2007 by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] is assigned to the Body Composition Program.” and “SECT[ion] A, Item 5a: MRO is currently assigned to the Body...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2786 14
Decumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4255 14
fitness report meets the criteria for derogatory material in Sect A, Item 6B and is rendered adverse IAW [in accordance with] MCO [Marine Corps Order] P1610.7F. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC)} Performance Evaluation Review Board {PERB}), dated 31 March 2014 as amended by the HOMC e-mail dated 10 April 2014 with attachments, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1714 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 4 February 2014 and 18 July 2014 as amended by the HOMC e-mail dated 5 August 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8611 13
— Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report for 2 June 2011 to 28 February 2012 by filing a Memorandum for the Record showing that section A, item 6.a (“Commendatory Material”) is marked, and including in section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”) “Directed Comments: Item 6A: MRO [Marine reported on] was awarded a Meritorious Mast and two Letters of Appreciation during this reporting period.” A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9146 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report by marking section A, item 6.a (*Commendatory Material”) and adding, to section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), "Directed Comment: MRO [Marine reported on] received a Meritorious Mast on 24 April 2008.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2014. New...